![]() ![]() You actually issuing git fetch + git merge commands, which will result with an extra commit and ugly merge bubbles in your commit log (check out gitk to see them). What you might not know is that by typing git pull #Rebase on master git codeThis has a number of advantages, including that it makes your code easier to review, easier to accept, and easier to merge.When working on a project you usually synchronize your code by pulling it several times a day. #Rebase on master git PatchThis makes it easy to submit a clean patch to an upstream project using git send-email or by creating a pull request against the parent repository with your newly tidied up patchset. Like magic, the work that went into the other commits is still there on your branch, but the associated commits have disappeared from your history! The example above results in "One-liner bug fix" and "Integrate new header everywhere" being merged into one commit, and "New header for docs website" and "D'oh - typo. At each stage where you have chosen to modify a commit (either with reword, edit, squash, or when there is a conflict), the rebase stops and allows you to make the appropriate changes before continuing. When you are finished, simply save the final result, and the rebase will execute. ![]() You can reorder commits by moving them around in the file.Squash merges multiple commits into one.Edit allows you to make changes to the commit while in the process of replaying the branch.Reword allows you to change a commit message, perhaps to fix a typo or add additional commentary.Pick maintains the commit in your history.When you run git rebase -i, you get an editor session listing all of the commits that are being rebased and a number of options for what you can do to them. Second, you do not have a merge commit, so any merge conflicts are identified as your changes are being replayed onto the master branch, and you need to fix them before proceeding with the rebase. When you push your changes now, your work does not appear on a branch, and it looks as though you wrote all of your changes off the very latest commit to the master branch. First, since your commits are now branching off a different parent node, their hashes will be recalculated, and anyone who has cloned your repository may now have a broken copy of the repository. It rewinds your commits and replays those commits again from the tip of the master branch. When you push your changes back to the parent repository, all of your local work will appear as a branch for other users of the Git repository.īut git rebase works differently. If there are any conflicts (for example, if someone else has changed a file you are also working with), these will be marked, and you have an opportunity to resolve the conflicts before committing this merge commit to your local repository. #Rebase on master git plusWhen you use git merge, a new commit is created on the master branch that includes all of the changes from origin plus all of your local changes. ![]() There are two ways to integrate your work back with the master branch in the original repository: one is to use git merge, and the other is to use git rebase.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |